|
|
 Lenko
> Frequenter (367)
> 15/11/10 13:44
|
| are you saying that chick in the link wasnt attractive? |
| - Carrying Feidan since 2009 - |
|
nazrm
> Frequenter (480)
> 15/11/10 13:51
|
| Yes, it is me, hanglidin' about... Yep! |
23:32 Adnade- Naxx for me was like, the best instance ever.
23:32 Adnade- Especially c'thun |
|
Grunge
> LOOT FTW LIKES ME (551)
> 15/11/10 15:59
|
Lenko wrote: are you saying that chick in the link wasnt attractive?
If you think she was, then mate, I've got some bad news for you.
nazrm wrote: Yes, it is me, hanglidin' about... Yep!
Do you also Wingsuit around? (Check the wingsuit videos on that guys channel, siQ distance from cliffwalls in some shots).
Also:
http://i.imgur.com/ZXWXY.jpg |
Fans glory to the Gladiators,
Gods glory to the Heroes. |
|
darchon
> GET A LIFE (2092)
> 15/11/10 16:34
|
| She was pretty hot Grunge. |
|
|
Grunge
> LOOT FTW LIKES ME (551)
> 15/11/10 17:24
|
darchon wrote: She was pretty hot Grunge.
 |
Fans glory to the Gladiators,
Gods glory to the Heroes. |
|
Lenko
> Frequenter (367)
> 15/11/10 18:17
|
Grunge wrote: Lenko wrote: are you saying that chick in the link wasnt attractive?
If you think she was, then mate, I've got some bad news for you.
Whats the bad news? that im straight? |
| - Carrying Feidan since 2009 - |
|
Grunge
> LOOT FTW LIKES ME (551)
> 16/11/10 02:39
|
Lenko wrote:
Whats the bad news? that im straight?
The fact that your standards are pretty low? |
Fans glory to the Gladiators,
Gods glory to the Heroes. |
|
darchon
> GET A LIFE (2092)
> 16/11/10 12:36
|
Grunge wrote: Lenko wrote:
Whats the bad news? that im straight?
The fact that your standards are pretty low?
Just because you live in the playboy mansion doesn't mean other peoples standards are low! |
|
|
Mar
> WANNABE TROLL (1414)
> 16/11/10 13:53
|
| TIFMUFF. |
You forget one thing: Rock crushes scissors. But paper covers rock... and scissors cuts paper...
Kiff, we have a conundrum. Search them for paper... and bring me a rock.
-- Zapp Brannigan |
|
Konflict
> TROLL (1504)
> 16/11/10 16:28
|
|
|
Aleo
> LESS THAN 250 TO GO! (884)
> 17/11/10 13:50
|
|
|
Konflict
> TROLL (1504)
> 18/11/10 23:31
|
|
|
Toumari
> Frequenter (448)
> 19/11/10 03:47
|
|
|
Benqu
> "I TRIED MY BEST" (77)
> 19/11/10 15:31
|
|
|
Aleo
> LESS THAN 250 TO GO! (884)
> 21/11/10 16:33
|
|
|
Unplugged
> "I TRIED MY BEST" (60)
> 21/11/10 19:13
|
this was actually interesting  .
Basically the result can be every multiple of 9 between 1-10 and basically every multiple of 9 in that range has the first number going up and the second going down.
1 8
2 7
3 6
4 5
5 4
6 3
7 2
8 1
9 0 |
|
|
Asatar
> LESS THAN 250 TO GO! (778)
> 21/11/10 19:49
|
Unplugged wrote:
this was actually interesting .
Basically the result can be every multiple of 9 between 1-10 and basically every multiple of 9 in that range has the first number going up and the second going down.
1 8
2 7
3 6
4 5
5 4
6 3
7 2
8 1
9 0
Isnt that what everyone realised after about 5 seconds?  |
 |
|
Unplugged
> "I TRIED MY BEST" (60)
> 21/11/10 21:58
|
Asatar wrote: Unplugged wrote:
this was actually interesting .
Basically the result can be every multiple of 9 between 1-10 and basically every multiple of 9 in that range has the first number going up and the second going down.
1 8
2 7
3 6
4 5
5 4
6 3
7 2
8 1
9 0
Isnt that what everyone realized after about 5 seconds?
right , okay. if you're such a math wiz. tell me why if any multi digit number had it's digits added together then the result number of that addition had it's numbers added together till there's only one digit in the result then tested if that digit is divisible by 3. it will show if the original number is divisible by 3 or not.
ex: 8523 = 18 = 9 which is divisible by 3. so 8523 is indeed divisible by 3. |
|
|
Konflict
> TROLL (1504)
> 21/11/10 23:00
|
|
|
Unplugged
> "I TRIED MY BEST" (60)
> 23/11/10 20:36
|
 [/url] |
|
|
